Hello and greetings from Canada.
My name is Christine Massey and I'm here to share some important documents with you
relating to virology and more generally germ theory.
I'm going to share my website with you and show
you where you can find these important documents.
So I'm going to share my screen and explain to you while we go along.
So this is my website.
It's called fluoride free peel, a dot CA.
And what I have on my website, if you click where you see COVID-19 FOI
responses, this is going to take you to a webpage that
contains important information from 40 different countries.
And what these documents are is freedom of information.
I'll just explain quickly what that means for anyone who doesn't know.
Freedom of information is a process by which people can get
access to records that are not already publicly available.
And it's a legislative process and it's an available in many countries.
And so myself and people around the world have taken advantage of this process to
seek records that would be necessary in order for anyone
to show the existence of the alleged COVID-19 virus.
The name of the alleged virus is SARS-CoV -2.
And if somebody actually wanted to conduct science and show that there's a virus that
is infecting people, they would meet to actually find it.
And in order to sequence and characterize it, otherwise a particle and study it so
that with controlled experiments, which is the foundation of scientific
method, you would have to actually have a sample of this alleged virus to work with.
And if nobody has a sample of the alleged virus,
then nobody can have conducted any science.
And so this is what the majority of these requests were focusing on.
We were asking for any records of anyone in the world ever finding this alleged
virus in the bodily fluid or tissue or excrement
of any people anywhere on earth by anyone ever.
And to date, we have responses from 216
different institutions in 40 different countries.
And so far, no one has been able to provide us with even one record.
They can't provide us with even one record and they can't cite any record.
So they've all admitted that they don't have a sample of the alleged virus and
they don't even know if anyone else who ever
did obtain a sample of this alleged virus.
So I'm going to familiarize you a little bit with this webpage.
This is the main webpage for this alleged virus, SARS-CoV-2.
And that's just an excerpt from one of the ridiculous virology studies.
There's some links here that can take you to other places on my website or other
resources where you can find more information
because most people will be notes this topic.
And so there's some resources on my website that will help you learn about it.
So I'm just going to bring you down a bit.
And I'm in Canada.
So this is where initially on the webpage, I show you the Canadian institutions.
And as of today, we have responses from 52 different Canadian institutions.
We have institutions at the federal level, the provincial
level, and also many local municipal institutions.
So we have the public health agency of Canada on
record, not once, but twice, two or three times.
We have Health Canada.
We have the National Research Council of Canada.
We have an institution called the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization,
Dash International Vaccine Center, which is at the University of Saskatchewan.
And that's an institution where they collaborate with
people around the world on supposed viruses and vaccines.
We have the Canadian Institutes for Health Research on and on and on.
We have patented medicines, prices review board.
We have some police institutions, which might sound strange, but because
they help to enforce the so-called COVID regulations.
What I was doing there was showing that they
actually did so without any evidence that the L.H.
virus even exists.
We have the Ontario Ministry of Health.
That's a provincial.
I'm in the province of Ontario.
We have universities.
We have hospitals.
We have cities like the City of Toronto.
I live in the region of Peel, and the region of Peel has a public health unit.
So we have responses at all the various levels showing that nobody in Canada
actually has a record of anyone on earth obtaining a sample of this L.H.
virus, which again would be needed in order to sequence,
characterize it, and study it with controlled experiments.
And so this is showing that nobody in Canada has any science whatsoever to show
that there is a virus, that there was no virus to test for anything whatsoever.
Now, if we scroll down further, there's a few things I'll bring your attention to.
If you click on that, it will take you to an Excel file that
you can download that shows a list of all of these institutions.
And I have it here.
Also, I'll just open it and enlarge it.
I'm not just sorry.
let me see.
Okay, well, I won't enlarge it.
I thought I know how to do it.
But we have institutions in Argentina.
For example, that's their National Administration
of Laboratories in Health Institutes.
We have about probably 10 institutions in Australia that includes the Department of
Health, the Department of Health in the aged care.
The Peter Daugherty Institute for Infection and Community, which is the
Institute that claimed to have isolated the imaginary virus in Australia, etc.
We have Belgium, Brazil, the British Isles, Bulgaria, the 52 institutions from Canada.
We have institutions in the Czech Republic, including the Ministry of Health.
In Denmark, we have the Staten Serum Institute and another one that...
I'm sorry, I don't know how to pronounce it.
I don't know how to say that.
We have England, which have many institutions,
but they have them listed under the UK.
But specifically England, we have public health England and others.
We have Finland, the Institute for Health and Welfare.
We have in France, the National Agency for the Safety of Medicine and Health Products.
We have the Indian Council for Medical Research.
Research in Italy.
We have the Ministry of Health and the Institute
of National Institute for Infectious Diseases.
We have Japan, the Netherlands, Lithuania, many from New Zealand,
because my number one collaborator, Michael S.
He is in New Zealand, so he's covered in New Zealand Valley, well for us.
We have Norway, the Philippines, Portugal, Poland, the Republic of Belgium,
Korea, Colombia, Ireland, Serbia, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago,
Romania, Scotland, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Ukraine,
the United Kingdom, many, many places in the United Kingdom.
Thank you to someone named Mr. Hobbs, has helped us there a lot.
We have many institutions in the United States, including the CDC, the agencies
for talks, talks, substances and disease registry.
We have many with FDA, we have many of the state
departments of health on and on and on and on.
And then we have Uruguay and Wales, including public health wells.
So I'll close that now.
And so if you... one other thing I'll show you is... this
is a link to a Google Drive where many of these documents...
are in have been compiled into eight PDFs, so
that you can download many of them quickly.
It hasn't been updated for a while, but it has a lot of the responses are in there.
And this is important information of evidence for the people of the world to have.
And then this is a screenshot of some of the Excel list.
And then as you scroll down through this page, you'll
see that you can find all of the documents here.
Here's one from the World Health Organization, while
I had written to them and they didn't respond to me.
The later responded to a colleague in Japan.
And when she asked her records, they simply referred her to a webpage that
didn't include any relevant documents whatsoever.
With many responses from the CDC, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention in the United States.
States.
Several of them... I did some of them.
My colleague Michael did several of them.
This was the very first one that we obtained.
This was from November 7th of 2020.
And in this one, I'll enlarge the screen.
The CDC said that a search of our records failed
to reveal any documents pertaining to your request.
And then we have... another response from the CDC.
This was in 2021.
And all of the responses starting from March 1st that we received the CDC stopped
admitting flat out that they didn't have any records.
They started giving more convoluted responses
to make it sound like they do have science.
When they actually don't.
And referring us to your relevant studies.
What they admitted down here on the bottom of page.
three, they say that the definition of isolation provided
in their quest is outside of what is possible in virology.
Now we made it clear in the early requests where we used the word isolation.
We made it clear that we're talking about purification.
We're talking about separating the alleged virus from
everything else so that it can be studied properly.
So they're saying that this is not possible.
It's outside of what is possible in virology.
And they give a red herring excuse.
for why they don't have any records.
They say that viruses need cells to replicate.
This is a red herring because the request had absolutely
nothing to do with an alleged virus replicating.
We're simply asking for records about having been found and purified.
And they say cells require liquid food.
Again, that's irrelevant.
However, SARS-CoV-2 viruses may be isolated from a
human clinical specimen by culturing in cell culture.
Now culturing something.
What they actually do is put a clinical a whole specimen with a cell line.
And then typically they also add cow material, which they use fetal bovine serum.
And they also add toxic drugs.
So they're instead of trying to purify anything
they're going in the opposite direction.
They're taking the clinical sample, which is already a complex substance.
And they are mixing it with other complex substances
and making a wildly complex and unnatural mixture.
That tells us absolutely nothing about a virus.
And still, they don't try to purify from that mixture that they created.
Another example that I would... so there's literally hundreds and hundreds.
You could spend many hours scrolling through this website.
Like I said, we have eight responses just from the CDC.
And we have hundreds of other institutions on record as well.
So now I'm going to take you to the responses.
That I got from some institutions in Canada.
There were four institutions where researchers collaborated and allegedly
purified this alleged virus.
They published a paper claiming that they had isolated the virus.
But what in fact they did was begin mixing together
and make a wildly complex and unnatural mixture.
And what they do with this mixture is they...
They're adding the clinical sample to a cell line.
It's usually monkey kidney cells.
It's not even having anything to do with humans.
And they watched this mixture for several days.
And if the cell line starts to break down, they call that cytopathic effect.
And they attribute the effect to a virus.
They have not conducted a valid controlled experiment where they started out with a
specific particle that they think might be a virus.
And where they can attribute causation to that specific particle.
They don't have anything remotely valid happening.
They just mix all these things together and attribute the
result to a virus, which has nothing to do with science.
And it's not remotely logical.
So we asked all four of the institutions in question.
And they all admitted that they have no records.
And you can find all the responses from the four institutions.
And I just wanted to draw attention to the response, a comment that was made from
Mount Sinai Hospital, which is one of the four institutions.
They told me in their response, the lady who was responding to me said,
not only does the hospital... Oh, sorry, that's my...
What they said was, I've been engaging with our
experts at Sinai Health regarding your request.
We are not clear on the records that you are requesting as we are not aware the
isolation of a virus and the manner that you
have described is possible for any virus.
It is not within the scope of current scientific processes.
So they are telling us that this never happens
in biology, just like the CDC admitted.
This does not happen in biology.
They never find these alleged particles.
and purified them from the alleged hosts.
And this is not a limitation of technology, supposedly
proteins and other smaller particles are purified.
So it's not a limitation of the technology.
It's just not something that's done in biology.
Probably because if they did purify particles, they would not be able to show
that they actually fit the definition of a virus.
And now, Sinai Hospital admitted this to me not once, but twice.
There's actually two letters from them in here.
So I'll close that page for now.
So just to recap, we have literally hundreds and
hundreds of institutions from 40 different countries.
All of them failing to provide or cite even one record of this alleged virus
being found in and purified from any sick person anywhere.
And so this is showing that they literally
have no science whatsoever regarding COVID -19.
Because if you don't have any science showing that there's even a virus,
obviously you can not show that there's a coronavirus disease.
And this also means that all of the tests for
so-called COVID-19 have never been validated.
And they cannot be validated because nobody has a sample of the alleged virus.
So they don't have a valid gold standard.
Now, I'm going to take you to another page.
And this is a similar web page, but this is where we focus
on all of the other alleged viruses besides SARS-CoV-2.
Because as my colleagues and I who've been working on the FOIs discovered,
thank you to the efforts of other people, such as Dr. Stiffam Lanka and Germany and
Dr. Andrew.
We've come to realize that this problem is not specific to
COVID-19 as indicated by the CDC amount sign-in hospital.
It's all the virology.
It turns out it's not scientific.
They never have a valid independent variable.
And not only that, but they go in the exact opposite direction.
And what they actually do do is just blatant
pseudo-science by definition and pseudo -science.
So what we have on this page is responses to requests on other alleged viruses.
And we've covered many, not every single alleged virus, but many of them.
Here we have a response from public health agency of Canada.
I asked them for any record of any alleged virus that
supposedly infects humans being purified from a sick person.
And they admitted that they didn't have any whatsoever.
Your result has requested no records exist, and then they
go on to give a red herring explanation as to why that is.
Here we have the CDC.
They were asked for any record of any alleged virus that is supposedly covered
by a so-called vaccine on their vaccination
schedules, either for the children or for the adults.
And they weren't unable to provide any records.
And it goes on and on and on.
When it comes to... when I do requests on these other alleged viruses, it typically
send the requests to the CDC because that's such an influential organization.
So we have many responses here from the CDC.
We also have quite a few from New Zealand.
And here's one from Australia.
This is their National Science Research Agency.
The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization.
They admitted to having no record of any alleged virus being purified, any of the
alleged viruses that are on their immunization schedule.
We have the same from New Zealand's Ministry of Health.
No record of any of the viruses that are on their immunization schedule.
Here we have the Ministry of Health in New Zealand again.
We have the Crown Research Institute from New Zealand, which is the Institute of
Environmental Science and Research, admitting they didn't have anything.
Another one.
Here we have Denmark.
Some people in Denmark asked the... I don't know how you
pronounce that the name of your institution there in Denmark.
But for you people in Denmark, please be aware that this is a doctor at
the institution said that they don't hold any scientific evidence.
And again, this is for any of the... this is for any of the alleged viruses that
they authorities recommend children be so -called vaccinated against.
And then a lawyer with the Stat and Serum Institute
searched a journal databases and came up with nothing.
And again, all of these documents can be downloaded.
And then this is the work of a colleague in England who has asked many of the local.
..
Excuse me.
I'm in the cities because they have public health units and they, you know,
encourage people to get tested and administer tests and the so-called vaccines.
And so, my contact there in England has asked many, many of the institutions there.
And in fact, when this person contacts these institutions, they typically ask
them about about 10 different viruses and they never have records for any of them.
Oh, this is one of the newer responses that I have in Canada.
We have the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.
And this is the institution here that claims that
there are viruses affecting livestock and food.
And, you know, of course, every once in a while, they order for large numbers of
animals to be destroyed based on the fact that they are allegedly infected with...
dangerous viruses.
And the Canadian Food Inspection Agency admitted flat out to me.
I asked them for any scientific records showing the existence of any of the
viruses that they claim affect food or livestock in Canada ever.
Anything that has supposedly ever affected the livestock.
And they admitted flat out that they didn't have any records.
They did send me an Excel file of 655 virus studies that they had conducted,
but they admitted that none of them actually fit the definition of what I had
asked for because I had asked carefully to provide any records that actually showed
scientific evidence as per the scientific method and they didn't have any.
Here we have Adeno virus, no records from the CDC, AVAN influenza.
We have the CDC on record, public health agency of Canada on record, European
Center for Disease Control and Prevention can't prove the existence of H5N1.
And this is from Peterborough.
That's a town where I used to live in here in Canada.
We have Ebola virus.
The US CDC has no record for Ebola virus.
There's another one from the CDC, many institutions in England have no
record, Epstein-Barr virus, CDC had no records, hepatitis B or C.
This is from a local, I haven't asked the CDC about
that, but this is from Peterborough where I used to live.
Here we have the CDC admitting they don't have any
records for an alleged herpes virus, nothing for HIV.
And of course it was with HIV was one of their earliest... well, people,
there have always been people disputing the methods of virology and when you know
flaws, but HIV, of course, is one where there was a lot of pushback, a lot of
people realized years ago that the alleged virus hadn't even been shown to exist.
Here we have the CDC with HPV, no records, public health agency of Canada.
On and on, I'll just go quickly to give you an idea of which viruses we've
covered, HTLV, with the CDC, nothing, another HTLV.
Let's see, what else?
H1N1, that was H5N1 influenza virus, CDC has no record.
Japan's National Institute of Infectious Diseases is no record for influenza virus.
These are the local agencies in England, a lentivirus, nothing from the CDC,
Marburg virus, nothing from the CDC, New Zealand's Ministry of Health,
nothing from Marburg.
This is the institution that had claimed to have isolated the alleged SARS-CoV-2,
the COVID-19 virus, but didn't.
Public Health Agency of Canada, nothing from Marburg, Australia's
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, nothing from
Marburg, New Zealand's University of Auckland.
So, you're getting the idea, measles virus, nothing from the CDC,
Marburg's nothing from the CDC, nothing from the local agencies,
and that was the NIH National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases,
nothing.
They have nothing for SARS-CoV-2 either, nothing from the CDC, from Mackie Pox,
CDC again, New Zealand's Crown Research Institution, New Zealand's Ministry of
Health, on and on, Public Health Agency of Canada has nothing, nothing from the CDC
from Mackie Pox, CDC again, New Zealand's Crown Research Institution, New Zealand's
Ministry of Health, on and on, Public Health Agency of Canada has
nothing, and I'll just show you whichever viruses we asked, there were Sweden there,
Infested, they have nothing from Mackie Pox, this is a local agency, and let's see
what else we have, because my men is getting difficult for me to even keep
track, nothing for NIPA virus from the CDC, polio virus, nothing from the CDC,
New Zealand, also nothing, and those are the local ones in England, rabies virus,
nothing from the CDC, RSP, nothing from the CDC, and the alleged 2003 SARS virus,
or common coal virus, nothing from the CDC, same with New Zealand's Ministry of
Health and their Crown Research Institution, and the local institutions in
England, smallpox, nothing from the CDC, Public Health Agency of Canada,
West Nile virus, nothing from the CDC, XMRV and Zika virus, nothing from the CDC,
I think that's the end of it.
Now, I'm going to take you to another page where we have a mixture of freedom of
information responses, and we also have some colleagues who have written emails,
these are not freedom of information, but casual emails directly to virologists,
sort of a mixture of types of evidence here.
And the question here, we've been trying to
obtain details of so-called control experiments.
We know in virology because they never purify particles that they never have a
fully controlled, valid experiment, but what they do
do sometimes, most studies make no mention of controls.
But what they do in some studies is they'll vaguely mention what they call a
mock control, and they don't give details on
exactly what they did to those so -called controls.
So, for example, when they're doing their fake virus isolation with the cell lines,
they don't tell us exactly, they don't disclose and their
publications exactly what they did to those cell lines.
So, we don't know how comparable, how useful the control is.
We know it's never fully controlled because there's no purified particles and
that's the only way you could have a fully controlled experiment.
So, we're wanting to know more like what exactly
did they do with those so-called controls.
The other issue is they don't tell us the full results.
They don't tell us how many of the lab dishes they obtained the cytopathic effects.
These sort of details, they never give a full accounting of what they've done.
So, we've tried to get more information
through these freedom of information requests.
Well, this is important.
I'll just interrupt myself for a moment and highlight some work by Dr.
Stefan Laka, who's one of the real heroes in this whole saga.
He has known about this problem for years and he actually won a court case in
Germany years ago showing that there was no scientific
evidence for the existence of the alleged measles virus.
And one of the... to my understanding though, the
waking one, it was based on this issue with scientists.
The so-called scientists not carry no controls.
And so, because this is the foundation of the
scientific method is controlled experiments.
You should always be checking your assumptions
and seeing if you can disprove your assumptions.
And he showed that they had neglected that entirely with the so-called measles virus.
And what he did was he commissioned with the help of some other people raised money
and they had a laboratory run the type of controls
that you would think for all it just should be doing.
This is not involving purified particles, but just more... sometimes I call it more
about half a ass attempt at controls to check some of your assumptions.
So he treated cell lines in different ways based on what we see in these virology
papers, what they're doing with their experimental groups
where they think that they have a virus in the clinical sample.
He did different variations on that experiment and he showed that you still
get cytopathic effects even when you've not added
anything that is suspected of having a virus.
And this is what he did with the measles trial as well.
He showed that you don't have to add any allegedly infected material in order to
obtain the same effects that are declared as evidence of a virus.
And often referred to as virus isolation.
So we've tried to get more details and there's some great video as well from Dr.
Sam Balley on this topic.
We tried getting details both Michael and I from the CDC.
And the CDC's publication, we did a fraudulent
publication by Jennifer Harcourt and her colleagues.
And one of the things... oh, sorry, this is actually something different.
This is some emails that Michael did with a Chinese virologist years ago.
A virologist that was involved in one of the earliest papers that are trying to buy
a JHAO, I'm not sure how you pronounce it exactly.
And he... the virologist admitted in these emails that in their experimental group,
they used double the amount of anti-fungal and anti-biotic
that they did in their control group, showing that...
And they made it sound like it doesn't really matter, 1% or 2%, it's no big deal.
But it just... it was actually a natural confession from a virologist that they
weren't doing things the same way in both groups.
So that was really important.
And then we also tried doing freedom of information requests to get further
details that are not published about this so-called mock controls that were very
vaguely mentioned in the publication by Jennifer Harcourt at all.
And what we received from the CDC was just laughable pages and pages of the four
letters that are meant to represent a so
-called genome and other irrelevant materials.
And every institution that has been asked so far
has not been willing to part with these details.
And we've received a variety of different ridiculous excuses.
For example, the health security agency in the UK, as she cited national security
exemptions saying it would be too dangerous to release these details.
And it makes no sense even if you believe in viruses because they do publish the
details of what they do in their experimental group,
which is the group that supposedly includes a virus.
We're only trying to get the additional details
about the control group that doesn't even have.
Suppose that the virus added to it.
We just want to know, did you do the exact same thing with those?
The same amount of toxic drugs, the same amount of fetal bovine serum,
everything should be comparable as possible.
And so we're trying to find out just how much effort are
they even making when they do their half-assed controls.
And none of these institutions will part with the
information and there's no valid reason for it.
Sometimes Michael has been given ridiculous fee estimates,
the reason he's being told that he would need to pay.
I think it was $3,000 to obtain the records.
One institution said that the University of Toronto refused to give me records.
They used as an excuse, a provision in the
legislation that excludes any records involving drugs.
Some research that is involved somebody from an educational institution.
Now the legislation doesn't prohibit them from sharing these records.
They simply took advantage of something in the legislation
that says that those type of records don't have to be released.
And so they didn't release them.
And again, and then we have many, some of them are quite amusing.
Email exchanges that another other colleagues have had with with actual
virologists, people who were involved in studies.
I think these are mostly SARS-CoV-2 studies.
And asking them, did you even try implementing these controls, for example,
when you're doing your so-called sequencing?
Did you try running the exact same procedure by using a clinical sample from
someone who was not considered to be infected with the virus?
And the answer was no, they just admit that no, they didn't do this.
So there's quite a few, quite a few email exchanges here.
And I won't go through it all, but there's a lot of material there.
And then one other thing I'll just mention quickly
that we haven't spent as much attention to.
But because germ theory in general is being is some questions these days.
It's not just the issue with viruses, but it seems also bacteria exist.
But with bacteria, they haven't actually been shown to be the cause of disease.
They have been shown to be correlated, but
correlation, of course, does improve causation.
And some people believe that bacteria actually played beneficial role and
they're more like a clean-up crew and that blaming them
for diseases similar to blaming firefighters for fires.
So we have asked different institutions for scientific
evidence showing that bacteria actually the cause of disease.
And again, none of the institutions that we've asked for any of the allegedly
pathogenic bacteria, none of them have been able to actually provide us with any
scientific records to back up those claims.
So I won't go through all of this.
I'll just stop there.
And then I'll just show you finally, I have a
webpage for people who are new to this topic.
This topic is focused on mostly on virology, not so
much on the pathogenic, supposedly pathogenic bacteria.
It's mostly on virology.
And this is where people can find many different videos
and articles written by involving different people.
One of the people who I initially learned from was Dr. Andrew Kaufman and he's very
gifted at explaining things in a very simple way that anybody can understand.
The late David Crow in Canada was also wrote a brilliant article very early in April.
He was one of the people that I started learning from early on.
This is a 59 second minute second video from my colleague.
But anyway, here you have lots and lots of educational material videos and articles,
brilliant brilliant materials produced by different people around the world.
And I really recommend that it's an easy topic for anybody to learn about.
Nobody should be intimidated is actually very easy to understand.
And then I'll just take you back to my... that
first F-O-Y page about the alleged SARS -CoV-2.
If you scroll way, way down, you can find interviews that I have done where I'm
going into more depth with different people about this.
Probably one of the most in depth interviews that
I did is this one right here with Curtis cost.
So that is one, but again, the people that I just showed on
the other page are better at explaining things than I am.
So I hope this has been helpful.
And again, my website is fluoride3pl.ca.
That is the spelling FLU-O, not OU, fluoride3pl.ca because I'm in Canada.
And then when you get to the home page, if you click...
I'll take you to the home page so you see it.
If you click where it says COVID-19, maybe because I haven't been large so much.
It's not showing the menu.
I'm back here down here, COVID-19, F-O-Y responses, or
you can click here and you'll find them that way as well.
So I hope this has been helpful.
This is just a brief introduction to let you know that there is a massive body of
evidence collected from around the world, again, hundreds of institutions in 40
different countries showing that no one has a
sample of the alleged COVID-19 virus, SARS-CoV-2.
And also a massive body of evidence showing that institutions, every
institution that gets asked for any alleged virus, they're not able to show us
that anybody even has a sample of the alleged virus to study.
So I hope this is helpful.
I hope your conference in Denmark is successful and thank you
for your time and attention and all the best to everybody.
Thank you.